[This a translation of my contribution (in French) to the Report of the French
MP’s mission on local currencies, to be published in October]
Last
August, the French legislator passed a new in tilted “loi sur l’économie sociale et solidaire” (ESS) (law on the social and solidary based economy)[1] which introduced the concept of local currencies in the French
legislation.
You
can read the first general remarks we wrote on the subject in June while the
Law was still a project.
The law now definitely inserts in
the French monetary and financial code (CMF) two new articles (articles L.311-5
and L.311-6) in a section entitled “bills of local and complementary
currencies” (“titres de monnaies locales complémentaires”).
The
first article (L.311-5) states that Social
and Solidarity based economy undertakings (label acronym in French - EESS)
are allowed to issue and to manage local currencies when it is it’s only
corporate purpose. The regime relating to these currencies will be called 311-5 currencies.
The
second article (L311-6) then states that “when” a local currency “pertains to” banking payment services, payment services, electronic money then it must be issued and managed by a bank, a
payment provider or an emoney issuer. The regime relating to these currencies will be called 311-6 currencies.
I.
Local
currencies are legal currency
By referring to local currencies as
“bills of local and complementary currencies”, the French legislator has
clearly intended these new legal instruments to be “legal means of payment”. The
law does not state it be it is understood that local currencies are issued at
par with national currency. If these currencies were floating against national
currency they would find themselves much nearer the heterogeneous category of
“virtual currencies”.
The main consequence is that when
handing in these local currencies, they shall be accounted for as money and not
goods. The law is expected to make acceptation easy for everyone including
local authorities. However, as most means of payment except legal tender cash,
the acceptation cannot be forced upon the creditor.
Local currencies are legal
instruments of debt. – To promote this acceptation, the legislator combines the idea of money
(or currency) that reflects its ability of local currencies to circulate
without any legal constraints. The statement is important since the local
currencies are also referred to as “titres”.
A “titre” is legal instrument that is
supposed to carry (or incorporate) the debt of the issuer (i.e. like a bill or a security).
II.
Local
currencies in between regimes
Local currencies can appear in reality
in very different forms: a one size fits all regulation would have seem
difficult to implement. The present legislation divides local currencies into
two main categories to which apply two different legal regimes.
1.
A
new sub-banking law legal framework
Legal category. – In order to understand the first legal category of local currencies
(the one designated by article L.311-5), reference should be made to the
October 2103 issue of the French Banking Authority’s journal (La revue de l’ACPR[2]).
The presentation made by the regulator is inspired by a Cour de cassation
(French civil supreme court) decision of 2001 on the legal definition of paper
gift coupons. The Court said that when the coupons were not redeemable or
fungible instruments they did not qualify as means of payment in law. In other
words once issued, the local currencies of article L.311-5 should not be reimbursable
to the barer (nor can change be given) even if they could be made payable to a
limited number of enlisted merchants.
Article L.311-5 regime. – Local currencies that enter this category can be issued without prior
notification or registration. That is the straight forward wording of article
L.311-5. The law grants an issuer the
right to issue a local currency as long as three conditions are met: the
issuer has to be an undertaking of the social and solidary economy (the ESS law
explains which and how undertakings can get the certification: it combines
different criteria that greatly limit profit pursing activities…), such
issuance and management of a local currency must be its only corporate purpose
and finally, the local currency issued must not be redeemable.
The issuer of such local currency
falls out of the scope of banking regulation on both grounds of prudential
supervision and of payment services framework. Rather, les “titres” (the bills) are subjected to French
civil law of things and obligations.
Special regimes due to currency forms. – As favorable to local currencies as these provisions
seem, they actually work mainly with physical local currencies (on paper or
plastic). Indeed only physical local currencies can be issued on the receipt of
funds in national currency. Therefore, such form of currency has an immediate
advantage on other forms of money.
On the opposite, scriptural local currencies –
those detained in a scriptural (written) form on an account – can be issued as
long as they are not issued on the receipt of national currencies (usually they
are also redeemable). Currencies of Local exchange and trading systems (LETS)
are the best example of an implementation of the tolerance for non-convertible
payment instruments.
The logic applies also to electronic
local currencies: if the currency is issued on receipt of funds there is a
strong probability that it will be considered as Electronic money in the legal sense[3].
Yet, it could be possible to issue an electronic local currency under the
L.311-5 provisions if the funds are paid out not at issuance but at the moment
they are redeemed.
The logic here is common to
scriptural money and electronic money: as soon as an undertaking issues a
payment means (or in this case local currencies) on receipt of funds, in French
law, it is subject to banking regulations.
2.
Local
currencies as banking currencies
Category: commercial means of payment. – As soon as local currencies are either
redeemable for any bearer (physical local currencies) or issued on receipt of
funds (scriptural or electronic local currencies), they pertain to regulation
on means of payment. That is the point made by article L.311-6.
Payment services legislation: When payment instruments are no longer
physical and cannot be “handed over”, their circulation among people relies on
a framework of rules (event crypto-currencies like bitcoin need rules). The
rules have become legislation across the EU as “rights and obligations in
relation to the provision and use of payment services”. Conforming to these
rules calls for a strong infrastructure as well as technical and legal
resources that can cost too much for a local currency economic model.
However, besides the full
legislation applicable to payment services in the EU, a lower level set of
payment rights and obligations for “low-value payment instruments and electronic money” (Payment service
directive, art.34). To
be eligible for the “low-value
payment instruments” provisions, instruments must be capped to 30 EUR
operations, a spending limit of 150 EUR or a maximum storage capacity of 150
EUR.
Article L.311-6 and L.311-5 Issuers. – Not only do means of payment have to conform to
payments laws but the issuer of such instruments has to have a banking license.
Such licenses are quite disproportionate for must local currencies schemes. Some
schemes will prefer to subcontract their issuing activities to banks
(preferably cooperative ones). However, license exemptions are possible for
banking payment services (mainly physical means of payment), payment services
(means of payment for scriptural money) and electronic money issuing.
The three French license exemptions
are based on the same criterion which is formulated in the Payment services and
electronic money directives: the clause states that the European legislation
shall not apply to the services issued “under a commercial agreement with the issuer
either within a limited network of service providers”.
This criterion was conceived for
business models with a little number of shops and a high volume of cash. On the
opposite, local currency schemes operate with small cash volumes but a high
number of little businesses. It is still
not quite clear how it should apply to local currency schemes. Up to now, it
seems that the French regulator has applied the rule in a quite literal way.
Indeed, the objective of the European legislator was to distinguish general
payment instruments from payment instrument with a specific scope. The legal
framework was to apply completely to the first category of payment instruments
but instruments from the second were to be exempted. The first were also to be
completely assimilated to banking currencies and means of payment regulations,
the second were to be left out. This legislative model was implemented through
“the limited network” held by a commercial agreement criterion. What is needed
here, if to keep the philosophy of how categories are divided and yet,
understand how local currencies can fit in. We are back to the basic criteria.
The French legal innovation has come
up with different elements to designate the particular monetary activity of
local currency issuing. The law was drafted in a way that promotes the use of
local currencies but yet meets the difficulties of a complex legal framework.
As a consequence, the new legislation treats differently physical, scriptural
and electronic local currencies. Yet, article L.311-5 of the Monetary and
financial code introduces a proper infra-banking legislation of local
currencies with three types of criteria: nature of the issuer, activity of the
issuer, and nature of the instrument.
[1]
Loi n°2014-856 sur l’économie sociale et solidaire, 31 août 2014, JORF n° 0176 du 1 août 2014.
[2]
« Les monnaies locales », Revue
de l’ACPR, n°14, septembre - octobre 2013, p.14-15.
[3] Directive 2009/110/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on the taking
up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending Directives 2005/60/EC and
2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC, Official Journal L 267 ,
10/10/2009 P. 0007 - 0017
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire